Bienvenue dans le catalogue en ligne du centre de documentation conjoint de Smart et de Culture & Démocratie.
Le catalogue répertorie plus de 3000 ressources liées aux champs d’actions thématiques des quatre organisations partenaires, parmi lesquels : sociologie de l’art et de la culture, politiques culturelles, mouvement coopératif, entrepreneuriat solidaire, économie sociale.
Une partie des ressources dite « vive » est directement accessible dans le centre de documentation, une autre partie est archivée.
Ce fonds documentaire multilingue regroupe des ouvrages scientifiques, des essais, des guides pratiques, des thèses, des revues, des dossiers, des publications sur supports numériques, ….
Toutes les ressources disponibles dans le centre de documentation sont en consultation libre sur place. L’emprunt n’est pas consenti. Photocopieuse disponible sur place pour la reproduction d’extraits.
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Retourner au premier écran avec les dernières notices... |
Détail de l'indexation
Ouvrages de la bibliothèque en indexation D.01.2.



AGM PACK / Culture Action Europe
Titre : AGM PACK : 17th General Assembly of Members Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Culture Action Europe, Auteur Editeur : Culture Action Europe Année de publication : 2009 Importance : 35 Langues : Français Catégories : Bilan ; Europe ; finance ; Politique culturelle ; Rapport Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : Here at Culture Action Europe, we are looking forward to our 17th Annual General Meeting, taking place around the September Culture Forum organised by the European Commission.
Culture Action Europe has been intensively involved in the processes leading up to this event, from the rather disappointing 2007 Culture Forum in Lisbon, to the adoption of a European Agenda for Culture and the establishment of the civil society dialogue platforms.
Yes the European Culture Forum can offer an opportunity for cultural actors to hear what is happening at EU level. Yes there will be interesting debates, and a chance to see some of the European Commission’s transversal policy in action. It’s a dramatic improvement on the range and scope of events offered by DG Education and Culture even only 5 years ago. We know however that these large-scale events are most important for what happens afterwards, and what individuals and organisations can meaningfully take back to their own work.
How to ensure that a European Agenda for Culture can develop over time and deliver some concrete results, that there be some ownership for the cultural policies in Europe beyond an elite group of the initiated, and be understood as not just a project of a distant EU institution, but something that is taken up and defended by national ministries, local authorities, and most importantly artists and practitioners across Europe.
Facing a busy period in the EU institutions ahead for the next period, we are focusing on where we can really make a difference. Read Chris Torch on Sweden’s presidency and how culture can be seen at all in an EU where the autumn will be dominated by the Copenhagen summit on climate change. With global issues dominating, Dragan Klaic also reminds us that many organisations in Central and Eastern Europe are under threat as cuts follow the financial crisis, leaving the independent sector without resources.
At the beginning of a new parliamentary mandate and with a new Commission about to be appointed, let us not be cynical in the face of these steps towards establishing the Arts and Culture as a fundamental building block of the European project. Culture Action Europe and its members will be there in force to make their voices heard, even in a crowded room.AGM PACK : 17th General Assembly of Members [texte imprimé] / Culture Action Europe, Auteur . - [S.l.] : Culture Action Europe, 2009 . - 35.
Langues : Français
Catégories : Bilan ; Europe ; finance ; Politique culturelle ; Rapport Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : Here at Culture Action Europe, we are looking forward to our 17th Annual General Meeting, taking place around the September Culture Forum organised by the European Commission.
Culture Action Europe has been intensively involved in the processes leading up to this event, from the rather disappointing 2007 Culture Forum in Lisbon, to the adoption of a European Agenda for Culture and the establishment of the civil society dialogue platforms.
Yes the European Culture Forum can offer an opportunity for cultural actors to hear what is happening at EU level. Yes there will be interesting debates, and a chance to see some of the European Commission’s transversal policy in action. It’s a dramatic improvement on the range and scope of events offered by DG Education and Culture even only 5 years ago. We know however that these large-scale events are most important for what happens afterwards, and what individuals and organisations can meaningfully take back to their own work.
How to ensure that a European Agenda for Culture can develop over time and deliver some concrete results, that there be some ownership for the cultural policies in Europe beyond an elite group of the initiated, and be understood as not just a project of a distant EU institution, but something that is taken up and defended by national ministries, local authorities, and most importantly artists and practitioners across Europe.
Facing a busy period in the EU institutions ahead for the next period, we are focusing on where we can really make a difference. Read Chris Torch on Sweden’s presidency and how culture can be seen at all in an EU where the autumn will be dominated by the Copenhagen summit on climate change. With global issues dominating, Dragan Klaic also reminds us that many organisations in Central and Eastern Europe are under threat as cuts follow the financial crisis, leaving the independent sector without resources.
At the beginning of a new parliamentary mandate and with a new Commission about to be appointed, let us not be cynical in the face of these steps towards establishing the Arts and Culture as a fundamental building block of the European project. Culture Action Europe and its members will be there in force to make their voices heard, even in a crowded room.Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire AGM PACK / Culture Action Europe
Titre : AGM PACK : 17th General Assembly of Members Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Culture Action Europe, Auteur Editeur : Culture Action Europe Année de publication : 2009 Importance : 35 Langues : Anglais Français Catégories : Rapport Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : Here at Culture Action Europe, we are looking forward to our 17th Annual General Meeting, taking place around the September Culture Forum organised by the European Commission.
Culture Action Europe has been intensively involved in the processes leading up to this event, from the rather disappointing 2007 Culture Forum in Lisbon, to the adoption of a European Agenda for Culture and the establishment of the civil society dialogue platforms.
Yes the European Culture Forum can offer an opportunity for cultural actors to hear what is happening at EU level. Yes there will be interesting debates, and a chance to see some of the European Commission’s transversal policy in action. It’s a dramatic improvement on the range and scope of events offered by DG Education and Culture even only 5 years ago. We know however that these large-scale events are most important for what happens afterwards, and what individuals and organisations can meaningfully take back to their own work.
How to ensure that a European Agenda for Culture can develop over time and deliver some concrete results, that there be some ownership for the cultural policies in Europe beyond an elite group of the initiated, and be understood as not just a project of a distant EU institution, but something that is taken up and defended by national ministries, local authorities, and most importantly artists and practitioners across Europe.
Facing a busy period in the EU institutions ahead for the next period, we are focusing on where we can really make a difference. Read Chris Torch on Sweden’s presidency and how culture can be seen at all in an EU where the autumn will be dominated by the Copenhagen summit on climate change. With global issues dominating, Dragan Klaic also reminds us that many organisations in Central and Eastern Europe are under threat as cuts follow the financial crisis, leaving the independent sector without resources.
At the beginning of a new parliamentary mandate and with a new Commission about to be appointed, let us not be cynical in the face of these steps towards establishing the Arts and Culture as a fundamental building block of the European project. Culture Action Europe and its members will be there in force to make their voices heard, even in a crowded room.AGM PACK : 17th General Assembly of Members [texte imprimé] / Culture Action Europe, Auteur . - [S.l.] : Culture Action Europe, 2009 . - 35.
Langues : Anglais Français
Catégories : Rapport Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : Here at Culture Action Europe, we are looking forward to our 17th Annual General Meeting, taking place around the September Culture Forum organised by the European Commission.
Culture Action Europe has been intensively involved in the processes leading up to this event, from the rather disappointing 2007 Culture Forum in Lisbon, to the adoption of a European Agenda for Culture and the establishment of the civil society dialogue platforms.
Yes the European Culture Forum can offer an opportunity for cultural actors to hear what is happening at EU level. Yes there will be interesting debates, and a chance to see some of the European Commission’s transversal policy in action. It’s a dramatic improvement on the range and scope of events offered by DG Education and Culture even only 5 years ago. We know however that these large-scale events are most important for what happens afterwards, and what individuals and organisations can meaningfully take back to their own work.
How to ensure that a European Agenda for Culture can develop over time and deliver some concrete results, that there be some ownership for the cultural policies in Europe beyond an elite group of the initiated, and be understood as not just a project of a distant EU institution, but something that is taken up and defended by national ministries, local authorities, and most importantly artists and practitioners across Europe.
Facing a busy period in the EU institutions ahead for the next period, we are focusing on where we can really make a difference. Read Chris Torch on Sweden’s presidency and how culture can be seen at all in an EU where the autumn will be dominated by the Copenhagen summit on climate change. With global issues dominating, Dragan Klaic also reminds us that many organisations in Central and Eastern Europe are under threat as cuts follow the financial crisis, leaving the independent sector without resources.
At the beginning of a new parliamentary mandate and with a new Commission about to be appointed, let us not be cynical in the face of these steps towards establishing the Arts and Culture as a fundamental building block of the European project. Culture Action Europe and its members will be there in force to make their voices heard, even in a crowded room.Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 1233a D.01.2. CUL Livre Centre de doc Documentaires Disponible Benchmarking Unemployment Benefit Systems / Klara Stovicek
Titre : Benchmarking Unemployment Benefit Systems Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Klara Stovicek, Auteur ; Alessandro Turrini, Auteur Editeur : Bruxelles [Belgique] : Commision européenne Année de publication : 2012 Importance : 37 p ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-92-79-22975-6 Langues : Anglais Catégories : chomage ; enquête ; Etude ; Europe Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : This paper proposes a methodology for benchmarking unemployment benefits systems, with a view to assess reform needs and priorities. The methodology permits to assess different dimensions of unemployment benefit systems and to consider alternative relevant benchmarks. Looking at all relevant dimensions allows to better gauge how unemployment benefit systems perform in terms of their multi-faceted objectives (such as income support and stabilisation, incentives to take up work) and to have a more thorough assessment of each objective. Comparisons with alternative benchmarks offer the possibility of assessing against more meaningful country comparators, which take into account similarities in terms of economic fundamentals, institutions and policy settings. The methodology is applied to EU countries and results are discussed. Benchmarking Unemployment Benefit Systems [texte imprimé] / Klara Stovicek, Auteur ; Alessandro Turrini, Auteur . - Bruxelles (Belgique) : Commision européenne, 2012 . - 37 p.
ISBN : 978-92-79-22975-6
Langues : Anglais
Catégories : chomage ; enquête ; Etude ; Europe Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : This paper proposes a methodology for benchmarking unemployment benefits systems, with a view to assess reform needs and priorities. The methodology permits to assess different dimensions of unemployment benefit systems and to consider alternative relevant benchmarks. Looking at all relevant dimensions allows to better gauge how unemployment benefit systems perform in terms of their multi-faceted objectives (such as income support and stabilisation, incentives to take up work) and to have a more thorough assessment of each objective. Comparisons with alternative benchmarks offer the possibility of assessing against more meaningful country comparators, which take into account similarities in terms of economic fundamentals, institutions and policy settings. The methodology is applied to EU countries and results are discussed. Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 1322a D.01.2. STO Livre Centre de doc Documentaires Disponible Case Prison / Alessandra d'Angelo
Titre : Case Prison Titre original : Un jeu d'échecs Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alessandra d'Angelo, Auteur Editeur : Paris [France] : L'Harmattan Année de publication : 2016 Importance : 194 p. ISBN/ISSN/EAN : 978-2-8061-0314-7 Langues : Français Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : Alors que nous sommes au coeur de l'Europe, Guantanamo se vit chez nous, en les murs, dans l'indifférence la plus générale. Enfermement pur et dur, cette option politiquement correcte simpliste ne fait que surseoir à statuer. La tension carcérale est à son comble et nous risquons l'explosion ! Faut-il une nouvelle évasion, une nouvelle prise d'otage, des agents pénitentiaires en grève, parce que dépassés, pour une vraie prise de conscience? Faut-il de nouvelles radicalisations, de nouveaux attentats? Une généalogie carcérale héritée des cachots du Moyen Âge, qui enferme pour punir et redresser, a démontré à suffisance son cuisant échec. Paroxysme de ce choix politique, le nombre de nos détenus est en augmentation constante.
Pour casser cette spirale infernale, la question se pose, dès lors, aujourd'hui, de savoir ce que nous voulons faire de nos prisons et quel statut nous voulons pour nos détenus? Notre politique pénale ne deviendra cohérente, et donc profitable à la société civile à protéger, qu'au prorata d'une doctrine carcérale efficace, pédagogique et avant tout humaine. Les "a priori" véhiculés dans la société civile ne doivent pas être synonymes d'abandon de cette responsabilité de l'État. À ces conditions de réforme nécessaire seulement, la prison pourra alors devenir l'exception, tandis que la prévention de la récidive l'objectif. Donner un sens à la peine est la clé de voûte pour résoudre le problème chronique de l'enfermement. Parce que penser à ce pourquoi on est là, pour ne pas y retourner, donne à réfléchir et réfléchir permet de commencer à sortir d'une case.Case Prison = Un jeu d'échecs [texte imprimé] / Alessandra d'Angelo, Auteur . - Paris (5-7, rue de l'Ecole-Polytechnique, 15005, France) : L'Harmattan, 2016 . - 194 p.
ISBN : 978-2-8061-0314-7
Langues : Français
Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : Alors que nous sommes au coeur de l'Europe, Guantanamo se vit chez nous, en les murs, dans l'indifférence la plus générale. Enfermement pur et dur, cette option politiquement correcte simpliste ne fait que surseoir à statuer. La tension carcérale est à son comble et nous risquons l'explosion ! Faut-il une nouvelle évasion, une nouvelle prise d'otage, des agents pénitentiaires en grève, parce que dépassés, pour une vraie prise de conscience? Faut-il de nouvelles radicalisations, de nouveaux attentats? Une généalogie carcérale héritée des cachots du Moyen Âge, qui enferme pour punir et redresser, a démontré à suffisance son cuisant échec. Paroxysme de ce choix politique, le nombre de nos détenus est en augmentation constante.
Pour casser cette spirale infernale, la question se pose, dès lors, aujourd'hui, de savoir ce que nous voulons faire de nos prisons et quel statut nous voulons pour nos détenus? Notre politique pénale ne deviendra cohérente, et donc profitable à la société civile à protéger, qu'au prorata d'une doctrine carcérale efficace, pédagogique et avant tout humaine. Les "a priori" véhiculés dans la société civile ne doivent pas être synonymes d'abandon de cette responsabilité de l'État. À ces conditions de réforme nécessaire seulement, la prison pourra alors devenir l'exception, tandis que la prévention de la récidive l'objectif. Donner un sens à la peine est la clé de voûte pour résoudre le problème chronique de l'enfermement. Parce que penser à ce pourquoi on est là, pour ne pas y retourner, donne à réfléchir et réfléchir permet de commencer à sortir d'une case.Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 01182a D.01.2.DAN.C Livre Centre de doc Documentaires Disponible COMPENDIUM Cultural Policies and trends in Europe / Joris Janssens
Titre : COMPENDIUM Cultural Policies and trends in Europe : Country Profile : Belgium Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Joris Janssens, Auteur Editeur : Bonn [Allemagne] : Ericarts Année de publication : 2012 Importance : 78 Langues : Anglais Catégories : Belgique ; Conseil de l'Europe ; Europe ; Politique culturelle Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : Belgium/ 1. Historical perspective: cultural policies and instruments
As in other European countries, the field of cultural policies in Belgium developed following the Second World War and was mainly focussed on promoting universal, democratic values. A framework for culture policies was completed towards the end of the sixties and was centred on objectives of cultural democracy. Instruments of cultural policy were, in most cases, grants allocated to non-governmental organisations and not-for-profit associations.
Cultural policies are governed by the principle of subsidiarity whereby the state does not directly intervene, in principle, in cultural matters other than through general regulation and awarding of grants.
Subsidiarity, a principle enshrined in the international cultural development context, was adopted in Belgium not only out of a reaction against fascist activities running throughout the Second World War, but also to set itself apart from the communist countries (state culture) and from the United States (culture regulated by the market rather than by the state).
Since the 1970s, Belgium has undergone a step-by-step process towards building a federal state made up of territorial regions and linguistic communities. Today, Belgium is a federal country which is divided into 3 regions (Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels) and 3 linguistic communities (Flemish, French and German speaking communities), each with their competence for self-governance. The Regions are responsible for matters relating to territory including the economy, environment, housing and employment. The Communities are responsible for culture, education, some aspects of health and welfare, language usage and inter-community co-operation. The Regions and Communities have competence in the area of international co-operation and are authorised to engage in international agreements and sign treaties.
The history of cultural policies since the 1970s can therefore be looked at by examining the activities of the three independent linguistic communities (Flemish, French and German speaking communities), each with their own independent institutions, traditions and political influences.
COMPENDIUM Cultural Policies and trends in Europe : Country Profile : Belgium [texte imprimé] / Joris Janssens, Auteur . - Bonn (Allemagne) : Ericarts, 2012 . - 78.
Langues : Anglais
Catégories : Belgique ; Conseil de l'Europe ; Europe ; Politique culturelle Index. décimale : D.01.2. Européen Note de contenu : Belgium/ 1. Historical perspective: cultural policies and instruments
As in other European countries, the field of cultural policies in Belgium developed following the Second World War and was mainly focussed on promoting universal, democratic values. A framework for culture policies was completed towards the end of the sixties and was centred on objectives of cultural democracy. Instruments of cultural policy were, in most cases, grants allocated to non-governmental organisations and not-for-profit associations.
Cultural policies are governed by the principle of subsidiarity whereby the state does not directly intervene, in principle, in cultural matters other than through general regulation and awarding of grants.
Subsidiarity, a principle enshrined in the international cultural development context, was adopted in Belgium not only out of a reaction against fascist activities running throughout the Second World War, but also to set itself apart from the communist countries (state culture) and from the United States (culture regulated by the market rather than by the state).
Since the 1970s, Belgium has undergone a step-by-step process towards building a federal state made up of territorial regions and linguistic communities. Today, Belgium is a federal country which is divided into 3 regions (Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels) and 3 linguistic communities (Flemish, French and German speaking communities), each with their competence for self-governance. The Regions are responsible for matters relating to territory including the economy, environment, housing and employment. The Communities are responsible for culture, education, some aspects of health and welfare, language usage and inter-community co-operation. The Regions and Communities have competence in the area of international co-operation and are authorised to engage in international agreements and sign treaties.
The history of cultural policies since the 1970s can therefore be looked at by examining the activities of the three independent linguistic communities (Flemish, French and German speaking communities), each with their own independent institutions, traditions and political influences.
Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 1506a D.01.2. JAN Livre Centre de doc Documentaires Disponible Creative Europe in Belgium / Collectif
PermalinkCulture 2007-2013 / Point Contact Culture
PermalinkCulture internationale Europe / Jean-Michel Dijan
PermalinkLa culture en mouvement
PermalinkDialogue(s) interculturel(s) en Europe / Anne-Marie Autissier
PermalinkDirectives "Services" et SSIG : rétroactes et enjeux / transpositions et perspectives / Luca Ciccia
PermalinkENCATC Activity Report 2010 / ENCATC
PermalinkEurocult 21 Intagrated Report / jill Robison
PermalinkL'Europe sociale / Étienne Grass
PermalinkLe "forfait sur le contenu" : une solution au partage illégal de fichiers ? / Alain Modot
Permalink